twitter: be important for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web site
Weight: 0.72
, web page
Weight: 0.64
, forum
Weight: 0.64
, website
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.63
Siblings blog
Weight: 0.37
, web
Weight: 0.37
, wikipedia
Weight: 0.36
, web browser
Weight: 0.35
, google
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for business 1.00
be good for business 0.94
be useful for business 0.91
be used in business environment 0.86
be important for marketing 0.81
be good for marketing 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(website, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(twitter, be important for business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(twitter, be important for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(website, be important for business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(website, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(website, be important for business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(blog, be important for business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(website, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(twitter, be important for business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(twitter, be important for business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(blog, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(blog, be important for business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(blog, be good for business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(twitter, be important for business)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(twitter, be good for business)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(twitter, be good for business)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(twitter, be used in business environment)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(twitter, be used in business environment)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(twitter, be used in business environment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(twitter, be important for marketing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(twitter, be important for marketing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(twitter, be good for marketing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(twitter, be important for marketing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(twitter, be good for marketing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(twitter, be good for marketing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be used in business environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for marketing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for marketing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(twitter, be important for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(website, be good for business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(website, be important for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(blog, be good for business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(blog, be good for marketing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(blog, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(website, be important for business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(website, be good for business)