fountain pen: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pen
Weight: 0.76
, object
Weight: 0.66
, mechanical pencil
Weight: 0.62
, article
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ballpoint pen
Weight: 0.42
, fountain
Weight: 0.37
, statue
Weight: 0.35
, sharpie
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mechanical pencil, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fountain pen, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fountain pen, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(pen, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fountain pen, has quality better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(article, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fountain pen, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pen, has quality better)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mechanical pencil, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(article, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(pen, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pen, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pen, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(article, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mechanical pencil, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(fountain pen, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(fountain pen, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(pen, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(fountain pen, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(article, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(fountain pen, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(fountain pen, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(fountain pen, has quality good)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fountain pen, has quality good)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(fountain pen, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fountain pen, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fountain pen, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fountain pen, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(article, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pen, has quality better)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pen, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mechanical pencil, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pen, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mechanical pencil, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(article, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(fountain pen, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pen, has quality good)