fox: be at arctic tundra

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, man
Weight: 0.65
, prey
Weight: 0.64
Siblings arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38
, raccoon
Weight: 0.38
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at arctic tundra 1.00
be at arctic 0.94
be at artic 0.80
be at prairie 0.76
be at prairie area 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be at arctic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(arctic fox, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, be at arctic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(fox, be at arctic tundra)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(fox, be at arctic)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at arctic)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at artic)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(fox, be at artic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(fox, be at prairie)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fox, be at arctic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fox, be at prairie area)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fox, be at prairie area)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fox, be at prairie)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fox, be at artic)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at prairie)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(fox, be at prairie)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fox, be at arctic)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at prairie area)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(fox, be at prairie area)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(fox, be at artic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at arctic tundra)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(fox, be at arctic tundra)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at arctic tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be at arctic)