fox: be at prairie area

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, man
Weight: 0.65
, prey
Weight: 0.64
Siblings arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38
, raccoon
Weight: 0.38
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at prairie area 1.00
be at prairie 0.97
be at rural area 0.78
be at meadow 0.77
be at wooded area 0.77
be at arctic tundra 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mammal, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fox, be at prairie area)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(wild animal, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fox, be at prairie area)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mammal, be at meadow)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at meadow)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at meadow)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be at meadow)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mammal, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fox, be at prairie area)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(wild animal, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fox, be at prairie area)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rabbit, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(rabbit, be at meadow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(fox, be at prairie area)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(fox, be at prairie)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at prairie)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(fox, be at prairie)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(fox, be at arctic tundra)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fox, be at meadow)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fox, be at rural area)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at arctic tundra)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at rural area)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fox, be at prairie)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at meadow)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(fox, be at arctic tundra)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at wooded area)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fox, be at wooded area)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(fox, be at meadow)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fox, be at wooded area)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(fox, be at rural area)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(fox, be at wooded area)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fox, be at meadow)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(fox, be at rural area)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(fox, be at arctic tundra)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at prairie area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fox, be at prairie area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, be at meadow)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rabbit, be at meadow)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fox, be at prairie area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, be at meadow)