fox: be at california

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, man
Weight: 0.65
, prey
Weight: 0.64
Siblings arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38
, raccoon
Weight: 0.38
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at california 1.00
be at oklahoma 0.80
be at arkansas 0.80
be at usa 0.80
be at new mexico 0.80
be at alaska 0.79
be at tennessee 0.78
be at europe 0.78
be at virginia 0.78
be at michigan field 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(fox, be at california)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(fox, be at arkansas)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(fox, be at usa)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fox, be at tennessee)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fox, be at virginia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(fox, be at michigan field)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(fox, be at europe)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fox, be at arkansas)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(fox, be at usa)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(fox, be at tennessee)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fox, be at michigan field)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(fox, be at europe)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(fox, be at virginia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(fox, be at europe)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(fox, be at michigan field)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(fox, be at virginia)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fox, be at tennessee)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at europe)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at virginia)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(fox, be at usa)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(fox, be at arkansas)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at tennessee)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at michigan field)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at usa)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at arkansas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fox, be at california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fox, be at california)