fox: be at michigan field

Property	Similarity
be at michigan field	1.00
be at tennessee	0.81
be at indiana	0.80
be at oklahoma	0.80
be at arkansas	0.79
be at idaho	0.78
be at california	0.77
be at virginia	0.77
be at alaska	0.77
be at louisiana	0.76

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(fox, be at california)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(fox, be at tennessee)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.33

Salient(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(fox, be at california)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(fox, be at idaho)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(fox, be at indiana)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(fox, be at arkansas)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.33

Salient(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(fox, be at tennessee)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(fox, be at indiana)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(fox, be at tennessee)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(fox, be at louisiana)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(fox, be at virginia)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(fox, be at virginia)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(fox, be at california)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(fox, be at idaho)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(fox, be at louisiana)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(fox, be at arkansas)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.33

Salient(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(fox, be at virginia)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.33

Salient(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Salient(fox, be at idaho)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(fox, be at arkansas)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(fox, be at idaho)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(fox, be at indiana)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(fox, be at tennessee)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.33

Salient(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(fox, be at louisiana)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(fox, be at louisiana)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(fox, be at california)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.33

Salient(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(fox, be at indiana)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(fox, be at virginia)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.33

Salient(fox, be at michigan field) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(fox, be at arkansas)

Parents	mammal Weight: 0.74 , wild animal Weight: 0.71 , predator Weight: 0.68 , man Weight: 0.65 , prey Weight: 0.64
Siblings	arctic fox Weight: 0.39 , coyote Weight: 0.39 , kangaroo rat Weight: 0.38 , raccoon Weight: 0.38 , rabbit Weight: 0.38

fox: be at michigan field

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible