fox: be bad hunting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad hunting 1.00
is hunting 0.96
get hunted 0.81
is hunted 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fox, be bad hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is hunted)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fox, be bad hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, is hunted)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(fox, be bad hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(arctic fox, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, is hunted)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(fox, be bad hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(red fox, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(red fox, is hunted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(fox, be bad hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(fox, be bad hunting)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(fox, be bad hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fox, is hunted)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(fox, be bad hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fox, get hunted)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(fox, be bad hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(fox, get hunted)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(fox, be bad hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(fox, is hunted)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(fox, be bad hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(fox, is hunted)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(fox, be bad hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(fox, get hunted)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(fox, be bad hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fox, get hunted)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(fox, be bad hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fox, is hunted)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(fox, be bad hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fox, be bad hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fox, be bad hunting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(fox, be bad hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fox, be bad hunting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fox, be bad hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(arctic fox, is hunted)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fox, be bad hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(red fox, is hunted)