:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fox, dig holes)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(coyote, dig holes)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fox, dig holes)
⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(fox, dig holes)
Similarity expansion
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(fox, dig holes)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(fox, dig)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(fox, dig holes)
⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fox, dig)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fox, dig holes)
⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(fox, dig)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(fox, dig holes)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fox, dig)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(fox, dig holes)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fox, dig up garden)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(fox, dig holes)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in holes)
...
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fox, dig holes)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fox, dig holes)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fox, dig holes)
⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(coyote, dig holes)