fox: have orange fur

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have orange fur 1.00
have fur 0.92
have fur in winter 0.89
have fur in summer 0.89
lose fur 0.88
get fur during winter 0.86
have insulating fur 0.81
get coats in arctic 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mammal, have fur)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fox, have orange fur)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(mammal, have fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mammal, have fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(coyote, have fur)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have fur)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have fur)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mammal, have fur)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fox, have orange fur)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(red fox, have fur)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, have fur)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(arctic fox, have fur)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have fur)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(coyote, have fur)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(coyote, have fur)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(fox, have orange fur)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fox, have fur)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(fox, have fur)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(fox, have fur)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(fox, have fur in winter)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fox, have fur in winter)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(fox, have fur in winter)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fox, have fur in winter)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(fox, get fur during winter)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(fox, get fur during winter)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(fox, have insulating fur)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(fox, get fur during winter)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fox, lose fur)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fox, have insulating fur)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have insulating fur)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fox, have fur)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(fox, get fur during winter)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(fox, have insulating fur)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(fox, lose fur)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(fox, lose fur)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fox, lose fur)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fox, have orange fur)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fox, have orange fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, have fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(red fox, have fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(coyote, have fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have fur)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(fox, have orange fur)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, have fur)