fox: have fur in winter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have fur in winter 1.00
get fur during winter 0.98
have fur in summer 0.97
have fur 0.94
have orange fur 0.89
lose fur 0.89
have insulating fur 0.84
turn in winter 0.82
get coats in arctic 0.81
survive in winter 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mammal, have fur)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fox, have fur in winter)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(mammal, have fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mammal, have fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(coyote, have fur)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have fur)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, turn in winter)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have fur)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mammal, have fur)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(fox, have fur in winter)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(red fox, have fur)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, have fur)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(arctic fox, have fur)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have fur)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(coyote, have fur)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(coyote, have fur)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, turn in winter)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(red fox, turn in winter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(fox, have fur in winter)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fox, have fur)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(fox, have fur)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(fox, have fur)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(fox, get fur during winter)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(fox, get fur during winter)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fox, have orange fur)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(fox, have orange fur)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fox, have orange fur)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(fox, get fur during winter)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(fox, get fur during winter)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(fox, have insulating fur)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have insulating fur)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fox, have orange fur)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fox, have fur)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fox, have insulating fur)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(fox, have insulating fur)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fox, lose fur)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(fox, lose fur)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(fox, lose fur)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fox, survive in winter)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fox, lose fur)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fox, turn in winter)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fox, survive in winter)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(fox, survive in winter)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fox, turn in winter)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fox, survive in winter)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(fox, turn in winter)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(fox, turn in winter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fox, have fur in winter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fox, have fur in winter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, have fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(red fox, have fur)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(coyote, have fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have fur)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, turn in winter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fox, have fur in winter)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, have fur)