fox: live in forests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
live in forests 1.00
live in woodlands 0.89
live in grasslands 0.86
live in tundra 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(red fox, live in forests)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(coyote, live in grasslands)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, live in tundra)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(red fox, live in forests)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(coyote, live in grasslands) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(coyote, live in grasslands)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(arctic fox, live in tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, live in tundra)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(fox, live in forests)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fox, live in woodlands)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fox, live in grasslands)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(fox, live in woodlands)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(fox, live in grasslands)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fox, live in tundra)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in forests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fox, live in forests)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, live in tundra)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(coyote, live in grasslands)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red fox, live in forests)