red fox: live in forests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
live in forests 1.00
live in deciduous forests 0.90
live in prairies 0.78
live in taiga 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red fox, live in forests)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fox, live in forests)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in forests)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(red fox, live in forests)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(red fox, live in forests)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(red fox, live in deciduous forests)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(red fox, live in deciduous forests)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(red fox, live in deciduous forests)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, live in deciduous forests)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(red fox, live in prairies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, live in taiga)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(red fox, live in prairies)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(red fox, live in taiga)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(red fox, live in prairies)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(red fox, live in prairies)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(red fox, live in taiga)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(red fox, live in taiga)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(red fox, live in forests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red fox, live in forests)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fox, live in forests)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(red fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fox, live in forests)