framework: be important in research

Related concepts

Parents	strategy Weight: 0.68 , structure Weight: 0.61 , policy Weight: 0.60 , approach Weight: 0.60 , system Weight: 0.57
Siblings	schema Weight: 0.58 , maven Weight: 0.46 , guideline Weight: 0.33 , dialogue Weight: 0.33 , outline Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in research	1.00
be for research	0.96
be important in technology	0.80
be important in counselling	0.79
be used by researchers	0.76
be important in education	0.76
is analysis	0.76
be important to business	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(structure, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(framework, be important in research)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(policy, be important in education) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(framework, be important in research)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(strategy, be important to business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(framework, be important in research)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(structure, be important in technology)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(strategy, be important to business)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(policy, be important in education)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(structure, be important in technology)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in education)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(guideline, be used by researchers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(structure, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(framework, be important in research)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(policy, be important in education) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(framework, be important in research)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(strategy, be important to business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(framework, be important in research)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(guideline, be used by researchers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(guideline, be used by researchers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(framework, be important in research)

Similarity expansion

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(framework, be for research)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(framework, be for research)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(framework, be for research)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(framework, be for research)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(framework, be important in counselling)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(framework, be important in counselling)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(framework, be important in counselling)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(framework, be important in counselling)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(framework, be important in research)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(framework, be important in research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(strategy, be important to business)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(policy, be important in education)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(structure, be important in technology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(guideline, be used by researchers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(structure, be important in technology)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(strategy, be important to business)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(framework, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(policy, be important in education)