structure: be important in technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents building
Weight: 0.68
, modification
Weight: 0.63
, project
Weight: 0.63
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
Siblings pyramid
Weight: 0.73
, system
Weight: 0.72
, empire state building
Weight: 0.70
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.69
, arch
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in technology 1.00
be important to evolution 0.77
be relevant to company 's strategy 0.77
be important in healthcare 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(structure, be important in technology)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(structure, be important in technology)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(structure, be important in technology)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(structure, be important to evolution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(structure, be important in technology)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(structure, be relevant to company 's strategy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(structure, be important in technology)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(structure, be important in healthcare)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(structure, be important in technology)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(structure, be important to evolution)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(structure, be important in technology)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(structure, be important in healthcare)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(structure, be important in technology)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(structure, be relevant to company 's strategy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(structure, be important in technology)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(structure, be important to evolution)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(structure, be important in technology)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(structure, be important in healthcare)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(structure, be important in technology)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(structure, be relevant to company 's strategy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(structure, be important in technology)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(structure, be relevant to company 's strategy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(structure, be important in technology)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(structure, be important in healthcare)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(structure, be important in technology)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(structure, be important to evolution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(structure, be important in technology)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(structure, be important in technology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(structure, be important in technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(structure, be important in technology)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(structure, be important in technology)