fraud: be categorized under aggression

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scandal
Weight: 0.68
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, financial institution
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.57
Siblings fortune teller
Weight: 0.57
, corruption
Weight: 0.34
, barrack
Weight: 0.34
, bribery
Weight: 0.34
, money laundering
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be categorized under aggression 1.00
go against non aggression principle 0.83
go against aggression principle 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fraud, be categorized under aggression) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(fraud, be categorized under aggression)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(fraud, be categorized under aggression) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(fraud, go against aggression principle)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fraud, be categorized under aggression) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fraud, go against non aggression principle)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fraud, be categorized under aggression) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fraud, go against non aggression principle)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(fraud, be categorized under aggression) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(fraud, go against non aggression principle)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fraud, be categorized under aggression) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(fraud, go against non aggression principle)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fraud, be categorized under aggression) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fraud, go against aggression principle)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fraud, be categorized under aggression) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(fraud, go against aggression principle)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fraud, be categorized under aggression) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fraud, go against aggression principle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(fraud, be categorized under aggression) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(fraud, be categorized under aggression) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fraud, be categorized under aggression)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fraud, be categorized under aggression) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(fraud, be categorized under aggression)