fraud: go against aggression principle

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scandal
Weight: 0.68
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, financial institution
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.57
Siblings fortune teller
Weight: 0.57
, corruption
Weight: 0.34
, barrack
Weight: 0.34
, bribery
Weight: 0.34
, money laundering
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
go against aggression principle 1.00
go against non aggression principle 0.98
be categorized under aggression 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(fraud, go against aggression principle)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(fraud, go against aggression principle)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(fraud, go against aggression principle)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fraud, go against non aggression principle)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(fraud, go against aggression principle)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(fraud, go against non aggression principle)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(fraud, go against aggression principle)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(fraud, go against non aggression principle)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(fraud, go against aggression principle)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(fraud, be categorized under aggression)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(fraud, go against aggression principle)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fraud, be categorized under aggression)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fraud, go against aggression principle)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fraud, go against non aggression principle)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(fraud, go against aggression principle)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(fraud, be categorized under aggression)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fraud, go against aggression principle)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fraud, be categorized under aggression)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(fraud, go against aggression principle)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(fraud, go against aggression principle)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fraud, go against aggression principle)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(fraud, go against aggression principle)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(fraud, go against aggression principle)