free will: has quality advantage

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.66
, subject
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings free time
Weight: 0.36
, now
Weight: 0.32
, do
Weight: 0.32
, time travel
Weight: 0.32
, healthy
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality advantage 1.00
be evolutionary advantage 0.79
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(free will, has quality advantage)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(free will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gift, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(free will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gift, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(free will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(free will, has quality advantage)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(free will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(free will, has quality advantage)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(free will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(free will, be evolutionary advantage)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(free will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(free will, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(free will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(free will, be evolutionary advantage)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(free will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(free will, be evolutionary advantage)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(free will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(free will, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(free will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(free will, be evolutionary advantage)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(free will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(free will, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(free will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(free will, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(free will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(free will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(free will, has quality advantage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(free will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(free will, has quality advantage)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(free will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(free will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)