french fry: suck bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.57
, vegetable
Weight: 0.47
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.33
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.33
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.32
, okra
Weight: 0.31
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
suck bad 1.00
get bad rap 0.77
be bad for gut 0.77
taste like shit 0.76
get damn mushy 0.76
stink 0.76
taste bad 0.76
be bad for leaky gut 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(french fry, suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, stink)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(french fry, suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cauliflower, stink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(cauliflower, stink)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(french fry, suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(french fry, suck bad)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(french fry, suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(french fry, suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(french fry, taste bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(french fry, suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste like shit)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(french fry, suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(french fry, taste like shit)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(french fry, suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(french fry, suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste like shit)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(french fry, suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(french fry, taste bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(french fry, suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(french fry, taste like shit)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(french fry, suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(french fry, get damn mushy)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(french fry, suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(french fry, get damn mushy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(french fry, suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(french fry, get damn mushy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(french fry, suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(french fry, get damn mushy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(french fry, suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(french fry, suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(french fry, suck bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(french fry, suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(french fry, suck bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(french fry, suck bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cauliflower, stink)