fresh food: is cheaper

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.74
, topic
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings fresh fruit
Weight: 0.76
, egg
Weight: 0.66
, bread
Weight: 0.66
, fruit
Weight: 0.66
, vegetable
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cheaper 1.00
is more expensive 0.86
is expensive 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fresh food, is cheaper)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fresh food, is cheaper)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fresh food, is cheaper)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fresh food, is cheaper)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fresh food, is cheaper)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fresh food, is cheaper)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(fresh fruit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fresh food, is cheaper)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(fresh food, is more expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is more expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(fresh food, is expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fresh food, is more expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fresh food, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fresh food, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is cheaper)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fresh food, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fresh food, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)