fresh fruit: be better than fruit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.76
, food
Weight: 0.73
, beverage
Weight: 0.68
, flavor
Weight: 0.68
Siblings orange juice
Weight: 0.78
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.72
, blueberry
Weight: 0.70
, mango
Weight: 0.69
, cherry
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than fruit 1.00
be better than dried fruit 0.90
be better than juice 0.87
has quality better 0.75
has state juice 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fresh food, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fresh food, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(orange juice, has state juice)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fresh food, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(orange juice, has state juice)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(orange juice, has state juice)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than dried fruit)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than juice)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be better than dried fruit)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than juice)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(fresh fruit, be better than juice)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, has state juice)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, has quality better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, has state juice)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fresh fruit, has state juice)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be better than juice)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than dried fruit)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(fresh fruit, be better than dried fruit)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, has state juice)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(fresh fruit, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, has quality better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(fresh food, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(orange juice, has state juice)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(fresh food, has quality better)