fresh fruit: has state juice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.76
, food
Weight: 0.73
, beverage
Weight: 0.68
, flavor
Weight: 0.68
Siblings orange juice
Weight: 0.78
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.72
, blueberry
Weight: 0.70
, mango
Weight: 0.69
, cherry
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state juice 1.00
be better than juice 0.88
be better than fruit 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, has state juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(orange juice, has state juice)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fresh fruit, has state juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(orange juice, has state juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(orange juice, has state juice)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fresh fruit, has state juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fresh fruit, has state juice)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fresh fruit, has state juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than juice)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fresh fruit, has state juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(fresh fruit, be better than juice)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(fresh fruit, has state juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than juice)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(fresh fruit, has state juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be better than juice)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(fresh fruit, has state juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fresh fruit, has state juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fresh fruit, has state juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(fresh fruit, has state juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fresh fruit, has state juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, has state juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, has state juice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fresh fruit, has state juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, has state juice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, has state juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(orange juice, has state juice)