frog: be harmful to man

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reptile
Weight: 0.78
, creature
Weight: 0.72
, tree frog
Weight: 0.65
, amphibian
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, turtle
Weight: 0.39
, toad
Weight: 0.39
, saltwater crocodile
Weight: 0.38
, otter
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harmful to man 1.00
be beneficial to man 0.88
is poisonous 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(tree frog, is poisonous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(frog, be harmful to man)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(tree frog, is poisonous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is poisonous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(toad, be harmful to man)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(toad, be beneficial to man)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be beneficial to man)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(tree frog, is poisonous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(frog, be harmful to man)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(toad, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(toad, be harmful to man)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(lizard, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(lizard, be beneficial to man)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(toad, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(toad, be beneficial to man)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(frog, be harmful to man)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(frog, be beneficial to man)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(frog, be beneficial to man)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(frog, be beneficial to man)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(frog, be beneficial to man)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(frog, be harmful to man)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(frog, be harmful to man)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tree frog, is poisonous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(toad, be harmful to man)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(toad, be beneficial to man)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lizard, be beneficial to man)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(frog, be harmful to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tree frog, is poisonous)