frog: has physical part tongues

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reptile
Weight: 0.78
, creature
Weight: 0.72
, tree frog
Weight: 0.65
, amphibian
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, turtle
Weight: 0.39
, toad
Weight: 0.39
, saltwater crocodile
Weight: 0.38
, otter
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tongues 1.00
have sticky tongues 0.88
has physical part teeth 0.81
has physical part eyes 0.79
has physical part legs 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tree frog, has physical part legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part tongues)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tree frog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part tongues)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has physical part legs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part legs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tree frog, has physical part legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part tongues)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tree frog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part tongues)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(frog, has physical part tongues)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(frog, has physical part teeth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part teeth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part teeth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part teeth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(frog, have sticky tongues)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part tongues)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part legs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part legs)