fruit tree: has physical part zones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deciduous tree
Weight: 0.86
, planting
Weight: 0.72
, vegetable
Weight: 0.70
Siblings oak tree
Weight: 0.83
, cherry tree
Weight: 0.80
, pear
Weight: 0.75
, pomegranate
Weight: 0.66
, banana
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part zones 1.00
has physical part zone 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fruit tree, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, has physical part zone)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fruit tree, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cherry tree, has physical part zone)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fruit tree, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(oak tree, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(oak tree, has physical part zone)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fruit tree, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cherry tree, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(cherry tree, has physical part zone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fruit tree, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(fruit tree, has physical part zones)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fruit tree, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fruit tree, has physical part zone)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(fruit tree, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(fruit tree, has physical part zone)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(fruit tree, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fruit tree, has physical part zone)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(fruit tree, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fruit tree, has physical part zone)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(fruit tree, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit tree, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fruit tree, has physical part zones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fruit tree, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit tree, has physical part zones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fruit tree, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(oak tree, has physical part zone)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fruit tree, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cherry tree, has physical part zone)