fruit: be better than juice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.66
, material
Weight: 0.62
, snack
Weight: 0.62
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
, crop
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pear
Weight: 0.69
, apple
Weight: 0.67
, watermelon
Weight: 0.67
, peach
Weight: 0.67
, fig
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than juice 1.00
be healthier than juice 0.93
be healthier than fruit juice 0.91
be better than fruit 0.87
be better than sugar 0.86
be better than candy 0.84
be healthier than candy 0.81
be better than vegetables 0.81
be better than dried fruit 0.81
be healthier than cereal 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(fruit, be better than juice)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(fruit, be healthier than juice)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(fruit, be healthier than juice)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be healthier than juice)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(fruit, be healthier than candy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(fruit, be better than candy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(fruit, be healthier than candy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fruit, be better than candy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be healthier than candy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be better than candy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(fruit, be better than vegetables)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be better than vegetables)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fruit, be better than vegetables)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(fruit, be healthier than juice)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fruit, be healthier than candy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(fruit, be better than candy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(fruit, be better than vegetables)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be better than sugar)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fruit, be better than sugar)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(fruit, be better than sugar)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(fruit, be better than sugar)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fruit, be better than dried fruit)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be better than dried fruit)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fruit, be better than dried fruit)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(fruit, be better than dried fruit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be better than juice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, be better than juice)