fruit: be better than vegetables

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.66
, material
Weight: 0.62
, snack
Weight: 0.62
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
, crop
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pear
Weight: 0.69
, apple
Weight: 0.67
, watermelon
Weight: 0.67
, peach
Weight: 0.67
, fig
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than vegetables 1.00
be more expensive than vegetables 0.95
have vegetables 0.93
be different from vegetables 0.93
have important vegetables 0.93
is vegetables 0.93
taste better than vegetables for humans 0.92
be better than fruit 0.88
be healthier than fruit juice 0.85
be better than dried fruit 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, is vegetables)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(watermelon, is vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(watermelon, is vegetables)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(fruit, be better than vegetables)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fruit, is vegetables)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(fruit, be different from vegetables)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fruit, is vegetables)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, is vegetables)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be different from vegetables)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(fruit, be different from vegetables)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fruit, is vegetables)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fruit, be different from vegetables)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fruit, be better than dried fruit)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be better than dried fruit)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fruit, be better than dried fruit)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(fruit, be better than dried fruit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be better than vegetables)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(fruit, be better than vegetables)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(watermelon, is vegetables)