fruit: be different from vegetables

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.66
, material
Weight: 0.62
, snack
Weight: 0.62
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
, crop
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pear
Weight: 0.69
, apple
Weight: 0.67
, watermelon
Weight: 0.67
, peach
Weight: 0.67
, fig
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from vegetables 1.00
have vegetables 0.96
is vegetables 0.95
have important vegetables 0.95
be better than vegetables 0.93
be more expensive than vegetables 0.90
taste better than vegetables for humans 0.87
get on fruit 0.79
be better than dried fruit 0.79
be like peaches 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, is vegetables)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(watermelon, is vegetables)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(watermelon, is vegetables)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(fruit, be different from vegetables)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fruit, is vegetables)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fruit, is vegetables)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, is vegetables)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(fruit, be better than vegetables)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be better than vegetables)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fruit, be better than vegetables)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fruit, is vegetables)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(fruit, be better than vegetables)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fruit, be better than dried fruit)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be better than dried fruit)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fruit, be better than dried fruit)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(fruit, be better than dried fruit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be different from vegetables)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fruit, be different from vegetables)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be different from vegetables)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(watermelon, is vegetables)