fruit: be more expensive than vegetables

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.66
, material
Weight: 0.62
, snack
Weight: 0.62
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
, crop
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pear
Weight: 0.69
, apple
Weight: 0.67
, watermelon
Weight: 0.67
, peach
Weight: 0.67
, fig
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than vegetables 1.00
be better than vegetables 0.95
have important vegetables 0.90
have vegetables 0.90
be different from vegetables 0.90
is vegetables 0.89
taste better than vegetables for humans 0.89
be better than fruit 0.84
be healthier than fruit juice 0.82
be more sour than other coloured fruits 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, is vegetables)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(watermelon, is vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(watermelon, is vegetables)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(fruit, be better than vegetables)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be better than vegetables)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fruit, be better than vegetables)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fruit, is vegetables)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fruit, is vegetables)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(fruit, be different from vegetables)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, is vegetables)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be different from vegetables)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(fruit, be different from vegetables)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(fruit, be better than vegetables)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fruit, is vegetables)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fruit, be different from vegetables)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(watermelon, is vegetables)