fruit: satisfy sweet tooth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.66
, material
Weight: 0.62
, snack
Weight: 0.62
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
, crop
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pear
Weight: 0.69
, apple
Weight: 0.67
, watermelon
Weight: 0.67
, peach
Weight: 0.67
, fig
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
satisfy sweet tooth 1.00
satisfy tooth 0.96
taste sweet 0.79
has sweetness sweet 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, has sweetness sweet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fig, has sweetness sweet)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(apple, has sweetness sweet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(apple, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(apple, has sweetness sweet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fig, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(fig, has sweetness sweet)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(watermelon, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(watermelon, has sweetness sweet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, satisfy tooth)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(fruit, satisfy tooth)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fruit, satisfy tooth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fruit, taste sweet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has sweetness sweet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fruit, taste sweet)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(fruit, satisfy tooth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(fruit, has sweetness sweet)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fruit, taste sweet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fruit, has sweetness sweet)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fruit, taste sweet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fruit, has sweetness sweet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(fig, has sweetness sweet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(watermelon, has sweetness sweet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(apple, has sweetness sweet)