fruit: taste sweet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.66
, material
Weight: 0.62
, snack
Weight: 0.62
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
, crop
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pear
Weight: 0.69
, apple
Weight: 0.67
, watermelon
Weight: 0.67
, peach
Weight: 0.67
, fig
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste sweet 1.00
has sweetness sweet 0.91
taste sour 0.86
is delicious 0.81
is tasty 0.81
is yummy 0.80
satisfy sweet tooth 0.79
is tart 0.77
has sourness sour 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, has sweetness sweet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fig, has sweetness sweet)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(apple, has sweetness sweet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(apple, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(apple, has sweetness sweet)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fig, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(fig, has sweetness sweet)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(watermelon, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(watermelon, has sweetness sweet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fruit, taste sweet)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(fruit, has sweetness sweet)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has sweetness sweet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(fruit, has sourness sour)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has sourness sour)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(fruit, has sourness sour)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fruit, has sweetness sweet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fruit, has sweetness sweet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(fruit, satisfy sweet tooth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(fruit, has sourness sour)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fruit, taste sweet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fruit, taste sweet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(fig, has sweetness sweet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(watermelon, has sweetness sweet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fruit, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(apple, has sweetness sweet)