fuel: be considered nonrenewable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, petroleum
Weight: 0.66
, operating expense
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.61
, ingredient
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fuel oil
Weight: 0.80
, petrol
Weight: 0.75
, propane
Weight: 0.72
, gasoline
Weight: 0.70
, motor oil
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered nonrenewable jiskha 1.00
be considered nonrenewable 1.00
is nonrenewable 0.98
be considered nonrenewable resources 0.96
be considered nonrenewable resource 0.96
be called nonrenewable resources 0.94
is nonrenewable resource 0.93
be classified nonrenewable resources 0.92
be replaced by renewable resources 0.78
be considered finite resource 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(petroleum, is nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(petroleum, is nonrenewable resource)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(petroleum, is nonrenewable)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(petroleum, is nonrenewable resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, is nonrenewable)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, is nonrenewable resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, is nonrenewable)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, is nonrenewable resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(petroleum, is nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(petroleum, is nonrenewable resource)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(gasoline, is nonrenewable resource)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gasoline, is nonrenewable resource)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(gasoline, is nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(gasoline, is nonrenewable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fuel, is nonrenewable resource)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(fuel, is nonrenewable resource)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fuel, is nonrenewable resource)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fuel, is nonrenewable resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(petroleum, is nonrenewable resource)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(petroleum, is nonrenewable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gasoline, is nonrenewable resource)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(gasoline, is nonrenewable)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(petroleum, is nonrenewable)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(petroleum, is nonrenewable resource)