fuel: be considered nonrenewable resources

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, petroleum
Weight: 0.66
, operating expense
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.61
, ingredient
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fuel oil
Weight: 0.80
, petrol
Weight: 0.75
, propane
Weight: 0.72
, gasoline
Weight: 0.70
, motor oil
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered nonrenewable resources 1.00
be called nonrenewable resources 0.99
be considered nonrenewable resource 0.97
be classified nonrenewable resources 0.97
is nonrenewable resource 0.96
be considered nonrenewable jiskha 0.96
be considered nonrenewable 0.96
is nonrenewable 0.95
be considered resources 0.87
is exhaustible natural resources 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(petroleum, is nonrenewable resource)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(petroleum, is nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(petroleum, is nonrenewable resource)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(petroleum, is nonrenewable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, is nonrenewable)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, is nonrenewable resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, is nonrenewable)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, is nonrenewable resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(petroleum, is nonrenewable resource)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(petroleum, is nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(gasoline, is nonrenewable resource)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gasoline, is nonrenewable resource)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(gasoline, is nonrenewable)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(gasoline, is nonrenewable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fuel, is nonrenewable resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(fuel, be considered resources)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered resources)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(fuel, is exhaustible natural resources)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(fuel, be considered resources)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(fuel, be considered resources)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fuel, is exhaustible natural resources)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fuel, is nonrenewable resource)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fuel, is nonrenewable resource)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(fuel, is exhaustible natural resources)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(fuel, is nonrenewable resource)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(fuel, is exhaustible natural resources)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fuel, be considered nonrenewable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(petroleum, is nonrenewable resource)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(petroleum, is nonrenewable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gasoline, is nonrenewable resource)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(gasoline, is nonrenewable)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(petroleum, is nonrenewable resource)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(petroleum, is nonrenewable)