fuel: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, petroleum
Weight: 0.66
, operating expense
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.61
, ingredient
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fuel oil
Weight: 0.80
, petrol
Weight: 0.75
, propane
Weight: 0.72
, gasoline
Weight: 0.70
, motor oil
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
be good for environment 0.80
be improved by technology more durable than original 0.77
be bad for environment 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(petroleum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(material, be improved by technology more durable than original) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(operating expense, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(petroleum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(petroleum, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(petroleum, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(operating expense, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(petroleum, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(petroleum, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, be bad for environment)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(operating expense, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(propane, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(propane, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(petroleum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fuel, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(operating expense, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fuel, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(petroleum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fuel, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(material, be improved by technology more durable than original) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fuel, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(petroleum, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fuel, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(propane, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(propane, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(petrol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(petrol, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(propane, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(propane, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(gasoline, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(gasoline, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(fuel, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(fuel, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fuel, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(fuel, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(fuel, be good for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fuel, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be bad for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(fuel, be good for environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(fuel, be good for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fuel, be bad for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be good for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(operating expense, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(petroleum, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(petroleum, be bad for environment)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(petroleum, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(petrol, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(propane, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(propane, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(gasoline, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(operating expense, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(petroleum, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(petroleum, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(petroleum, be bad for environment)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)