function: be important for proteins

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, process
Weight: 0.60
, message
Weight: 0.59
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.79
, cell division
Weight: 0.67
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.67
, birthday party
Weight: 0.67
, operating system
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for proteins 1.00
be specifically important for proteins 0.95
be in eukaryotic cells more complex than in prokaryotic cells 0.86
be important in cells 0.86
be important for organisms 0.85
be important to organisms 0.84
be important for unicellular organisms 0.84
be important to unicellular organisms 0.83
be complicated in eukaryotic organisms 0.83
be important to multicellular organisms 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important to multicellular organisms)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important for organisms)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be in eukaryotic cells more complex than in prokaryotic cells)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important for unicellular organisms)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important to unicellular organisms)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be complicated in eukaryotic organisms)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cell division, be in eukaryotic cells more complex than in prokaryotic cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(cell division, be in eukaryotic cells more complex than in prokaryotic cells)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(cell division, be complicated in eukaryotic organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(cell division, be complicated in eukaryotic organisms)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(cell division, be important to unicellular organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important to unicellular organisms)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cell division, be important for organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important for organisms)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(cell division, be important for unicellular organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important for unicellular organisms)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cell division, be important to multicellular organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important to multicellular organisms)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(function, be important for proteins)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(function, be specifically important for proteins)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(function, be specifically important for proteins)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(function, be specifically important for proteins)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(function, be important in cells)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(function, be important in cells)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(function, be specifically important for proteins)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(function, be important in cells)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in cells)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(function, be important for proteins)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(function, be important for proteins)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cell division, be complicated in eukaryotic organisms)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cell division, be important to unicellular organisms)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cell division, be in eukaryotic cells more complex than in prokaryotic cells)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cell division, be important to multicellular organisms)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cell division, be important for unicellular organisms)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(function, be important for proteins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cell division, be important for organisms)