function: be important in cells

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, process
Weight: 0.60
, message
Weight: 0.59
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.79
, cell division
Weight: 0.67
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.67
, birthday party
Weight: 0.67
, operating system
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in cells 1.00
be important as related to size of cells 0.90
be in eukaryotic cells more complex than in prokaryotic cells 0.89
be similar in animal cells 0.86
be important for proteins 0.86
differ in animal cells 0.84
be in plant cell different from in animal cell 0.84
be specifically important for proteins 0.83
differ between animal cells 0.83
be related to cell cycle 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be in eukaryotic cells more complex than in prokaryotic cells)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be in plant cell different from in animal cell)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(cell division, differ between animal cells)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important as related to size of cells)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be related to cell cycle)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cell division, differ in animal cells)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be similar in animal cells)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cell division, be important as related to size of cells)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important as related to size of cells)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(cell division, be similar in animal cells)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(cell division, be similar in animal cells)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(cell division, differ in animal cells)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cell division, differ in animal cells)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cell division, be in eukaryotic cells more complex than in prokaryotic cells)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(cell division, be in eukaryotic cells more complex than in prokaryotic cells)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(cell division, differ between animal cells)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(cell division, differ between animal cells)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(cell division, be in plant cell different from in animal cell)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(cell division, be in plant cell different from in animal cell)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(cell division, be related to cell cycle)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cell division, be related to cell cycle)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(function, be important in cells)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(function, be important for proteins)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(function, be important for proteins)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(function, be specifically important for proteins)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(function, be specifically important for proteins)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(function, be important for proteins)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(function, be specifically important for proteins)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(function, be important for proteins)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(function, be specifically important for proteins)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in cells)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(function, be important in cells)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(cell division, differ in animal cells)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(cell division, differ between animal cells)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(cell division, be similar in animal cells)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cell division, be important as related to size of cells)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cell division, be in plant cell different from in animal cell)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(cell division, be related to cell cycle)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in cells)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cell division, be in eukaryotic cells more complex than in prokaryotic cells)