gambling: be regulated in usa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, addiction
Weight: 0.61
, habit
Weight: 0.61
, diversion
Weight: 0.59
Siblings betting
Weight: 0.35
, poker
Weight: 0.35
, pornography
Weight: 0.34
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be regulated in usa 1.00
is regulated 0.88
bad in usa 0.85
be banned in usa 0.85
be regulated in society 0.84
be legal in usa 0.84
be in uk 0.79
be illegal in australia 0.78
be in india 0.78
is tightly regulated 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pornography, be legal in usa)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(poker, be illegal in australia)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(poker, bad in usa)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(poker, be banned in usa)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(betting, be in india)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(betting, be in uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(pornography, be legal in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(pornography, be legal in usa)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(betting, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(betting, be in uk)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(poker, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(poker, be illegal in australia)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(poker, bad in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(poker, bad in usa)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(poker, be banned in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(poker, be banned in usa)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(betting, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(betting, be in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(gambling, be regulated in usa)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(gambling, is regulated)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(gambling, is regulated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(gambling, is regulated)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(gambling, is regulated)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in uk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(gambling, be illegal in australia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(gambling, be in uk)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(gambling, be in uk)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(gambling, be in uk)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(gambling, be illegal in australia)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(gambling, be illegal in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be regulated in usa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(gambling, be regulated in usa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(pornography, be legal in usa)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(poker, be illegal in australia)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(poker, bad in usa)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(betting, be in uk)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(poker, be banned in usa)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be regulated in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(betting, be in india)