gambling: is harmful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, addiction
Weight: 0.61
, habit
Weight: 0.61
, diversion
Weight: 0.59
Siblings betting
Weight: 0.35
, poker
Weight: 0.35
, pornography
Weight: 0.34
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is harmful 1.00
be harmful to women 0.90
increase harmful effects 0.87
harm environment 0.80
is dangerous 0.79
harm quality 0.79
harm quality of water 0.78
increase harmful effects of drought 0.78
be beneficial to society 0.78
increase harmful effects of prolonged drought 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(addiction, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(gambling, is harmful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(activity, increase harmful effects of prolonged drought) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(gambling, is harmful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(addiction, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(gambling, is harmful)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(activity, harm quality of water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(gambling, is harmful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(addiction, is harmful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(addiction, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(activity, harm quality of water)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(activity, increase harmful effects of prolonged drought)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(activity, harm quality of water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(activity, increase harmful effects of prolonged drought)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(addiction, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(addiction, is harmful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pornography, be harmful to women)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(addiction, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(gambling, is harmful)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(addiction, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(gambling, is harmful)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(activity, harm quality of water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(gambling, is harmful)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(activity, increase harmful effects of prolonged drought) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(gambling, is harmful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pornography, be harmful to women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(pornography, be harmful to women)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(gambling, is harmful)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(gambling, is dangerous)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(gambling, is dangerous)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(gambling, is dangerous)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gambling, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(gambling, is harmful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(gambling, is harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(addiction, is harmful)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(addiction, is dangerous)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(activity, increase harmful effects of prolonged drought)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(activity, harm quality of water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pornography, be harmful to women)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(addiction, is harmful)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(addiction, is dangerous)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(activity, increase harmful effects of prolonged drought)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(gambling, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(activity, harm quality of water)