gap: be between rich widening

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents store
Weight: 0.59
, distance
Weight: 0.59
, part
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.56
Siblings communication
Weight: 0.61
, third
Weight: 0.53
, sill
Weight: 0.39
, gulf
Weight: 0.31
, hole
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be between rich widening 1.00
be between widening 0.97
be between rich growing 0.87
be between growing 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gap, be between rich widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(gap, be between rich widening)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gap, be between rich widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(gap, be between widening)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(gap, be between rich widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(gap, be between widening)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gap, be between rich widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(gap, be between widening)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(gap, be between rich widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(gap, be between rich growing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gap, be between rich widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(gap, be between rich growing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gap, be between rich widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(gap, be between growing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(gap, be between rich widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(gap, be between growing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gap, be between rich widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(gap, be between rich growing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gap, be between rich widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(gap, be between growing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(gap, be between rich widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(gap, be between widening)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(gap, be between rich widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(gap, be between rich growing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(gap, be between rich widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(gap, be between growing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(gap, be between rich widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gap, be between rich widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(gap, be between rich widening)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gap, be between rich widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gap, be between rich widening)