gap: be between widening

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents store
Weight: 0.59
, distance
Weight: 0.59
, part
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.56
Siblings communication
Weight: 0.61
, third
Weight: 0.53
, sill
Weight: 0.39
, gulf
Weight: 0.31
, hole
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be between widening 1.00
be between rich widening 0.97
be between growing 0.81
be between rich growing 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(gap, be between widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(gap, be between widening)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(gap, be between widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gap, be between rich widening)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(gap, be between widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(gap, be between growing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(gap, be between widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(gap, be between rich widening)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(gap, be between widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(gap, be between rich widening)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(gap, be between widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(gap, be between rich growing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(gap, be between widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(gap, be between growing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(gap, be between widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gap, be between rich widening)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(gap, be between widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(gap, be between growing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(gap, be between widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(gap, be between rich growing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(gap, be between widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(gap, be between rich growing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(gap, be between widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(gap, be between growing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(gap, be between widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(gap, be between rich growing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(gap, be between widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(gap, be between widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(gap, be between widening)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(gap, be between widening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(gap, be between widening)