garbage: be in water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents waste
Weight: 0.62
, object
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.59
, mess
Weight: 0.58
Siblings human waste
Weight: 0.66
, banana peel
Weight: 0.58
, litter
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in water 1.00
buried in landfill cause pollution water supply 0.80
be in ocean 0.76
be bad in ocean 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(object, be in water)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(garbage, be in water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(object, be in water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(object, be in water)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(litter, be in ocean)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(object, be in water)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(garbage, be in water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(litter, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(litter, be in ocean)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(garbage, be in water)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be in ocean)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(garbage, be in ocean)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(garbage, be in ocean)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(garbage, be bad in ocean)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad in ocean)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(garbage, be bad in ocean)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(garbage, be in ocean)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(garbage, be bad in ocean)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution water supply)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution water supply)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution water supply)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution water supply)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be in water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(garbage, be in water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(object, be in water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(litter, be in ocean)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(garbage, be in water)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(object, be in water)