garbage: be in ocean

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents waste
Weight: 0.62
, object
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.59
, mess
Weight: 0.58
Siblings human waste
Weight: 0.66
, banana peel
Weight: 0.58
, litter
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in ocean 1.00
be bad in ocean 0.95
end up in ocean 0.90
be dumped in ocean 0.81
be in water 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(object, be in water)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(garbage, be in ocean)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(waste, be dumped in ocean)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(garbage, be in ocean)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(waste, be dumped in ocean)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(object, be in water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(waste, be dumped in ocean)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(object, be in water)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(litter, be in ocean)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(litter, end up in ocean)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(object, be in water)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(garbage, be in ocean)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(waste, be dumped in ocean)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(garbage, be in ocean)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(litter, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(litter, be in ocean)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(litter, end up in ocean)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(litter, end up in ocean)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(garbage, be in ocean)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(garbage, end up in ocean)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(garbage, end up in ocean)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(garbage, end up in ocean)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be dumped in ocean)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(garbage, be bad in ocean)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(garbage, be dumped in ocean)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(garbage, be in water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(garbage, be bad in ocean)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(garbage, be in water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad in ocean)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(garbage, end up in ocean)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be in water)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(garbage, be in water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(garbage, be dumped in ocean)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(garbage, be bad in ocean)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(garbage, be dumped in ocean)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be in ocean)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(garbage, be in ocean)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(waste, be dumped in ocean)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(object, be in water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(litter, be in ocean)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(litter, end up in ocean)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(waste, be dumped in ocean)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(object, be in water)