litter: end up in ocean

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.56
, garbage
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
, problem
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fishing line
Weight: 0.61
, trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, trash can
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
end up in ocean 1.00
be in ocean 0.90
be bad for ocean 0.88
have harmful to oceans animals gear 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(garbage, be in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(litter, end up in ocean)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(garbage, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(litter, end up in ocean)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(garbage, end up in ocean)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(garbage, be in ocean)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(garbage, end up in ocean)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be in ocean)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(trash, be in ocean)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash, be bad for ocean)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(garbage, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(litter, end up in ocean)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(garbage, be in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(litter, end up in ocean)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(trash, be in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(trash, be in ocean)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(trash, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(trash, be bad for ocean)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(litter, end up in ocean)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(litter, be in ocean)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(litter, be in ocean)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(litter, be in ocean)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for ocean)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(litter, be bad for ocean)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(litter, be in ocean)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for ocean)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(litter, end up in ocean)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(litter, end up in ocean)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(garbage, end up in ocean)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(garbage, be in ocean)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(trash, be in ocean)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(trash, be bad for ocean)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(garbage, end up in ocean)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(litter, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(garbage, be in ocean)