litter: be bad for ocean

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.56
, garbage
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
, problem
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fishing line
Weight: 0.61
, trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, trash can
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for ocean 1.00
be in ocean 0.94
end up in ocean 0.88
have harmful to oceans animals gear 0.81
be bad for environment 0.77
be bad for animals 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(garbage, be in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for ocean)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(garbage, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for ocean)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(garbage, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for ocean)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(garbage, end up in ocean)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(garbage, be in ocean)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(garbage, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be in ocean)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(garbage, end up in ocean)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash, be bad for ocean)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(trash, be in ocean)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(garbage, be in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for ocean)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(garbage, end up in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for ocean)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(garbage, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for ocean)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(trash, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(trash, be bad for ocean)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(trash, be in ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(trash, be in ocean)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(litter, be bad for ocean)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(litter, be in ocean)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(litter, be in ocean)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(litter, be in ocean)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(litter, end up in ocean)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(litter, end up in ocean)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(litter, end up in ocean)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(litter, be in ocean)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(litter, end up in ocean)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(litter, be bad for environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(litter, be bad for animals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for animals)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for animals)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for ocean)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(garbage, be in ocean)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(garbage, end up in ocean)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(garbage, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(trash, be bad for ocean)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(trash, be in ocean)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(garbage, be in ocean)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(garbage, end up in ocean)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(litter, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(garbage, be bad for environment)