litter: be bad for animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.56
, garbage
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
, problem
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fishing line
Weight: 0.61
, trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, trash can
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for animals 1.00
be bad for cats 0.92
be dangerous to animals 0.90
affect animals 0.88
be harmful to animals 0.87
be bad for kittens 0.85
kill animals 0.85
be bad for environment 0.79
be harmful to wildlife 0.79
have harmful to oceans animals gear 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(garbage, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for animals)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(garbage, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(garbage, affect animals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(garbage, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect animals)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(trash, be dangerous to animals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(trash, be harmful to animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(garbage, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for animals)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(garbage, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(trash, be dangerous to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(trash, be dangerous to animals)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(trash, be harmful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(trash, be harmful to animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(litter, be bad for animals)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for cats)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for cats)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(litter, be bad for cats)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(litter, affect animals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for kittens)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for kittens)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(litter, be bad for kittens)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for cats)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(litter, affect animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for kittens)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(litter, kill animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(litter, kill animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(litter, kill animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(litter, be dangerous to animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(litter, be dangerous to animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(litter, be dangerous to animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(litter, be bad for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(litter, be dangerous to animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(litter, kill animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(litter, be harmful to animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(litter, affect animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(litter, be harmful to wildlife)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(litter, be harmful to animals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(litter, be harmful to wildlife)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(litter, be harmful to animals)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(litter, be harmful to animals)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(litter, be harmful to wildlife)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(litter, be harmful to wildlife)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(litter, affect animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(garbage, affect animals)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(garbage, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(trash, be dangerous to animals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(trash, be harmful to animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(garbage, affect animals)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(litter, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(garbage, be bad for environment)