litter: be harmful to wildlife

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.56
, garbage
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
, problem
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fishing line
Weight: 0.61
, trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, trash can
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harmful to wildlife 1.00
be harmful to animals 0.88
be dangerous to animals 0.82
have harmful to oceans animals gear 0.81
affect animals 0.80
have harmful 0.80
is harmful 0.80
be bad for animals 0.79
kill animals 0.77
affect soil of forests 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(garbage, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(litter, be harmful to wildlife)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(garbage, affect animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(trash, be harmful to animals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(trash, be dangerous to animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(garbage, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(litter, be harmful to wildlife)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(trash, be harmful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(trash, be harmful to animals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(trash, be dangerous to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(trash, be dangerous to animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(litter, be harmful to wildlife)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(litter, affect animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(litter, be dangerous to animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(litter, be dangerous to animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(litter, be harmful to animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(litter, be harmful to animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(litter, be bad for animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(litter, affect animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(litter, kill animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(litter, kill animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(litter, affect animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(litter, be harmful to animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(litter, be dangerous to animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(litter, be harmful to animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(litter, kill animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(litter, have harmful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(litter, is harmful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(litter, affect soil of forests)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(litter, affect soil of forests)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(litter, is harmful)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(litter, is harmful)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(litter, affect animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(litter, be dangerous to animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(litter, have harmful)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(litter, is harmful)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(litter, have harmful)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(litter, kill animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(litter, affect soil of forests)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(litter, affect soil of forests)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(litter, be harmful to wildlife)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(litter, be harmful to wildlife)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(garbage, affect animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(trash, be harmful to animals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(trash, be dangerous to animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(litter, be harmful to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(garbage, affect animals)