litter: have harmful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.56
, garbage
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
, problem
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fishing line
Weight: 0.61
, trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, trash can
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have harmful 1.00
is harmful 0.98
be harmful to animals 0.89
be harmful to wildlife 0.80
have harmful to oceans animals gear 0.78
is dangerous 0.78
be identified as toxic inhalation hazard 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(trash, be harmful to animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(litter, have harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(trash, be harmful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(trash, be harmful to animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(litter, have harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(litter, have harmful)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(litter, have harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(litter, is harmful)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(litter, have harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(litter, is harmful)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(litter, have harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(litter, be harmful to animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(litter, have harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(litter, be harmful to animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(litter, have harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(litter, is harmful)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(litter, have harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(litter, have harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(litter, have harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(litter, have harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(trash, be harmful to animals)