litter: have harmful to oceans animals gear

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.56
, garbage
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
, problem
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fishing line
Weight: 0.61
, trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, trash can
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have harmful to oceans animals gear 1.00
be harmful to animals 0.85
be harmful to wildlife 0.81
be bad for ocean 0.81
be dangerous to animals 0.81
be in ocean 0.81
affect animals 0.78
be bad for animals 0.78
have harmful 0.78
end up in ocean 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(garbage, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(garbage, end up in ocean)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(garbage, end up in ocean)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(garbage, affect animals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(garbage, be in ocean)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be in ocean)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(garbage, end up in ocean)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(trash, be in ocean)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash, be bad for ocean)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(trash, be harmful to animals)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(trash, be dangerous to animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(garbage, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(garbage, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(garbage, end up in ocean)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(trash, be in ocean)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(trash, be in ocean)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(trash, be bad for ocean)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(trash, be bad for ocean)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(trash, be harmful to animals)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(trash, be harmful to animals)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(trash, be dangerous to animals)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(trash, be dangerous to animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(litter, be in ocean)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(litter, be in ocean)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(litter, be in ocean)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for ocean)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(litter, be bad for ocean)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(litter, affect animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(litter, end up in ocean)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(litter, end up in ocean)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(litter, end up in ocean)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(litter, be in ocean)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(litter, affect animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for ocean)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(litter, be bad for animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(litter, be dangerous to animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(litter, end up in ocean)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(litter, be dangerous to animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(litter, be harmful to animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(litter, be dangerous to animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for animals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(litter, be dangerous to animals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(litter, affect animals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(litter, be harmful to wildlife)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(litter, be harmful to animals)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(litter, have harmful)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(litter, be harmful to wildlife)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(litter, be harmful to animals)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(litter, have harmful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(litter, be harmful to animals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(litter, be harmful to wildlife)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(litter, be harmful to wildlife)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(litter, have harmful)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(litter, affect animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(garbage, be in ocean)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(garbage, affect animals)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(garbage, end up in ocean)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(trash, be in ocean)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(trash, be bad for ocean)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(trash, be harmful to animals)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(trash, be dangerous to animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(garbage, be in ocean)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(garbage, affect animals)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(litter, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(garbage, end up in ocean)