litter: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.56
, garbage
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
, problem
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fishing line
Weight: 0.61
, trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, trash can
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
do to environment 0.90
affect environment 0.87
has quality bad 0.80
destroy environment 0.80
be bad for animals 0.79
pollute environment 0.78
be bad for ocean 0.77
be with climate changes 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(garbage, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(garbage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(garbage, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(garbage, affect environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(garbage, be bad for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(garbage, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(garbage, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash, be bad for ocean)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(trash, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(trash, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(garbage, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(garbage, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(garbage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(trash, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(trash, affect environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(trash, be bad for ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(trash, be bad for ocean)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(trash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(trash, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(litter, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(litter, affect environment)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(litter, do to environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(litter, pollute environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(litter, destroy environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(litter, affect environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(litter, destroy environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(litter, destroy environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for ocean)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for ocean)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(litter, be bad for ocean)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(litter, do to environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(litter, pollute environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(litter, destroy environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(litter, be bad for animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for ocean)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for animals)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(litter, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for animals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(litter, affect environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(litter, do to environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(litter, pollute environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(litter, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(litter, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(litter, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(litter, do to environment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(litter, affect environment)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(litter, pollute environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(garbage, affect environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(garbage, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(garbage, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(trash, affect environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(trash, be bad for ocean)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(trash, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(garbage, affect environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(garbage, be bad for environment)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(litter, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(garbage, has quality bad)