litter: destroy environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.56
, garbage
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
, problem
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fishing line
Weight: 0.61
, trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, trash can
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
destroy environment 1.00
do to environment 0.83
affect environment 0.82
pollute environment 0.82
be bad for environment 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(garbage, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(litter, destroy environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(garbage, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(litter, destroy environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(garbage, affect environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(garbage, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(trash, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(garbage, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(litter, destroy environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(garbage, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(litter, destroy environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(trash, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(trash, affect environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(litter, destroy environment)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(litter, affect environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(litter, pollute environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(litter, do to environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(litter, pollute environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(litter, affect environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(litter, be bad for environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(litter, do to environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(litter, pollute environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(litter, affect environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(litter, do to environment)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(litter, do to environment)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(litter, pollute environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(litter, affect environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(litter, destroy environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(litter, destroy environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(garbage, affect environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(garbage, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(trash, affect environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(garbage, affect environment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(litter, destroy environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(garbage, be bad for environment)