litter: be bad for cats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.56
, garbage
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
, problem
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fishing line
Weight: 0.61
, trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, trash can
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for cats 1.00
be bad for animals 0.92
be bad for kittens 0.91
be dangerous to animals 0.83
affect animals 0.81
be harmful to animals 0.80
kill animals 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(garbage, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for cats)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(garbage, affect animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(trash, be dangerous to animals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(trash, be harmful to animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(garbage, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for cats)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(trash, be dangerous to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(trash, be dangerous to animals)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(trash, be harmful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(trash, be harmful to animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(litter, be bad for cats)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for kittens)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for kittens)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(litter, be bad for kittens)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(litter, affect animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for kittens)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(litter, be bad for animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(litter, kill animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(litter, affect animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(litter, kill animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for animals)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(litter, kill animals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(litter, be dangerous to animals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(litter, be dangerous to animals)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(litter, be dangerous to animals)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(litter, kill animals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(litter, be dangerous to animals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(litter, affect animals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(litter, be harmful to animals)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(litter, be harmful to animals)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(litter, be harmful to animals)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(litter, be harmful to animals)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(litter, affect animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for cats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for cats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(garbage, affect animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(trash, be dangerous to animals)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(trash, be harmful to animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(litter, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(garbage, affect animals)